Typically, mentor teachers are some of the brightest and best teachers in the school system. It has been stated that in response to the extension of the tenure period, school systems would provide an extensive network of mentor teachers. Here are some of the possible outcomes of adopting this proposal as I see them. The adoption of this proposal will undoubtedly satiate the appetites of those who believe shortcomings of the public education system are linked to poor teachers who are protected by tenure laws and teachers' unions that require administrators to adhere to those laws. One of the most controversial of these guidelines deals with extending the tenure period from two to three years. But what county struggling to fund its education budget will be able to withstand the pressure should they waver in their commitment to participate? Before picking from the federal tree Maryland should look long and hard at the consequences of adopting some of the federal guidelines/suggestions attached to the Race to the Top grant. And why shouldn't they? Participation is voluntary. 1 national educational ranking for the past two years is preparing to submit its plan to harvest the federal fruit. What state can afford to walk past a tree offering $250 million in educational aid in this economy? Even Maryland, a state that has achieved a No. The most recent offering of fruit from the federal Crickle Crack tree is the money being offered to states under the "Race to the Top" program for educational excellence.
0 kommentar(er)
